Workflow examples for construction teams

These examples show practical ways teams can use BrieXO bundles and XO apps. Verified customer case studies will be published here only when the customer, outcomes, and metrics are approved for public use.

Common workflow outcomes to evaluate

Evidence quality
Clearer records for review and handover
Review clarity
Decisions linked to the records behind them
Field readiness
Programme, labour, and competency context in one place
Portfolio context
Project signals easier to compare and explain

Example workflows

Design review workflow

DESIGN bundle direction

Model review context
Versioned decisions
Handover evidence
DesignBIM coordination

Keep design comments, model context, and revisions together

A design team can use BrieXO to review IFC/STEP model context, capture discussion threads, manage document revisions, and keep decision evidence close to the files being reviewed.

Typical problem
  • Model comments split from documents
  • Revision context lost in email
  • Handover evidence assembled late
BrieXO workflow
  • Web model review where configured
  • Threads tied to project records
  • Versioned files and audit events

Programme and readiness workflow

FIELD + XO Prog

WBS programme structure
Progress logs
Readiness evidence
ProgrammeField operations

Connect the programme promise to site evidence

Teams can structure WBS tasks, dependencies, baselines, progress logs, site records, RAMS gates, labour evidence, and competency readiness without claiming automatic Field-to-Prog progress writeback.

Typical problem
  • Programme files drift from site reality
  • Readiness evidence lives in separate systems
  • Progress updates lack a clean audit trail
BrieXO workflow
  • Baselines and progress logs in XO Prog
  • Daily records and QA/HSE checks in XO Field
  • Labour and competency context through FIELD apps

Portfolio evidence workflow

Analytics + sustainability + evidence

Dashboards and trends
Evidence packs
Carbon context
PortfolioGovernance

Make project evidence easier to explain

Developers and managers can bring field records, sustainability context, document history, and analytics views into a clearer evidence trail for review, approvals, and handover.

Typical problem
  • Evidence collected late
  • Portfolio status hard to compare
  • Sustainability context separated from delivery
BrieXO workflow
  • Evidence packs for review
  • Dashboards and operational trends
  • Sustainability records tied to project context

Explore by team type

Design teams

Design, BIM, specification, and evidence workflows

View designer workflows

Contractors

Programme, commercial, field, and coordination context

View contractor workflows

Specialist subcontractors

FIELD records, evidence, labour, and readiness workflows

View FIELD workflows

Property developers

Portfolio evidence, risk visibility, and governance workflows

View developer workflows

What strong construction workflows have in common

Quality control, sustainability targets, commercial context, and field evidence work best when they stay connected. Treating evidence as a continuous record makes reviews and handovers easier to explain.

  • QA and HSE records captured while work is happening
  • Portfolio views that stay tied to project-level evidence
  • Evidence packs that support approvals, reviews, and handover
  • Dashboards that help teams spot patterns without inventing certainty
FIELD operating workflows DESIGN bundle direction COMMERCIAL bundle direction

Ready to map your workflow?

We can walk through how BrieXO maps to your records, evidence, programme, commercial, and governance needs.

Schedule a Demo Explore FIELD